JW JW-A61PM-D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardJW JW-A61PM-D3  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 12:07
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 47
37% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 46.9
8-Core 49.6
6% 48.2 Pts
64-Core 69.2
4% 69.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
Nvidia(10DE CB84) 64MB
Ram: 64MB, Driver: 309.8
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 30 61 57 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 43.5
Write 65.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 48.2
33% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MB 500GB
237GB free
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 75 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 75.5
Write 53.5
Mixed 50
SusWrite 76
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback