MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 11:55
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,281
114% 962 Pts
64-Core 2,421
150% 2,421 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Device(1B4C A017) ≥ 4GB; Galax 2080Ti OCLab
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 229
Parallax 245
192% 236 fps
MRender 284
Gravity 228
Splatting 146
172% 220 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 168%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 332 331 331 329 321 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,517
Write 1,470
Mixed 1,130
SusWrite 381
303% 1,374 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 93.4
332% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,376
DQ Mixed 1,010
810% 1,121 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 279%
Great: 280%
Drevo X1 pro 64G 64GB
32GB free
Firmware: Q0303B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 252 253 254 255 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 327
Write 255
Mixed 241
SusWrite 254
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 48.3
168% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 156
130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
319GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 430 451 464 464 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 455
Mixed 458
SusWrite 448
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 56.4
187% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
150GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 317 317 317 319 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 439
Mixed 388
SusWrite 323
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 55.2
191% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 201
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
386GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 116 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 116
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 4400 C19 Series F4-3600C16-8GTZ F4-3600C16-8GTZ 32GB
3800, 3800, 3800, 3800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
139% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 49.7
149% 52.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 46.3
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,761
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback