Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMedion H77H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H77H2-EM
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 10:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$190
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.8% Very good
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
74% 158 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 525
61% 465 Pts
64-Core 526
35% 526 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$277
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 223
Reflection 197
Parallax 208
59% 209 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 207
Splatting 163
57% 172 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 237 132 124 127 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 463
Write 444
Mixed 336
SusWrite 200
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 33
130% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 346
264% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$124
334GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 75 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 59
SusWrite 76.3
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$124
118GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 93 94 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 69
Write 72
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 93.8
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Medion H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $360
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback