Sony VGN-FW31ZJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemSony VGN-FW31ZJ  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090827
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '16 at 19:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo T9550-$150
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24.1% Poor
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 94.6
34% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 96.2
8-Core 95.7
13% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 81.9
6% 81.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Sony(104D 9035) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 2.5
1% 5.57 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 8.8
1% 5.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2500BT G1 500GB
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0041000C Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 43.4
Mixed 40.4
31% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VGN-FW31ZJ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VGN-FW31ZJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $220
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback