Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99X Killer/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	22.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '19 at 22:21
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 232 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 715 71% 578 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.5% Excellent	Lighting 99.2 Reflection 115 Parallax 93.3 81% 103 fps	MRender 98.7 Gravity 94.6 Splatting 98.5 80% 97.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 486GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 105 79 79 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 464 Mixed 400 SusWrite 109 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 43.2 160% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 355 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 121%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 13GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 122 140 150 131 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 415 Write 181 Mixed 163 SusWrite 147 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 22.1 82% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 63.4 DQ Mixed 104 96% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 55GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 317 322 315 317 309 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 468 Mixed 384 SusWrite 303 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 56 191% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 356 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 979GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 102 105 106 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 82.9 Write 81.1 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 104 62% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 97 97 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 103 Write 94.2 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 96.4 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 15GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 71 71 72 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 71.7 Write 64.4 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 71.4 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 109GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 72 74 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 67.5 Write 67.5 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 73.3 49% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 101%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 153 154 155 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 159 Write 136 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 154 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 97%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 96GB free Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 56 58 59 60 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 87.7 Write 82.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 57.8 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 77GB free Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 56 58 59 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 72.1 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 57.7 47% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 57%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 106 Write 94.8 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 87 120% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.8 219% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 616 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 46.1 MC Write 47.1 MC Mixed 44.8 131% 46 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 23.5 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99X Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	18x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	5x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	3x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $119Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	3x
HyperX 2400 C15 8x8GBKingstonBench 115%, 85 samples	2x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 2,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $779

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16