Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3615QM 2,657 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 154 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 328 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Apple(106B 00F2) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.6% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 7.92 Parallax 10 7% 8.77 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 11.3 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.6% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM256E 251GB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM09A1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 359 356 322 287 279 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 404 Write 354 Mixed 255 SusWrite 319 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 18.1 65% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 147 119% 172 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.4% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.9 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	169x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	87x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	83x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16