Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120522
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 04:54
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2600-$306
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
51.2% Above average
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 166
62% 128 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 432
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 452
30% 452 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8400) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 12.7
4% 14.3 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 8.1
4% 12.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$60
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 4,809
Write 3,621
Mixed 3,985
920% 4,138 MB/s
4K Read 227
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 99
516% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 553
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 388
306% 429 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 125%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
97GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 93 100 91 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 217
Write 123
Mixed 157
SusWrite 96.6
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 28.7
99% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 33.9
30% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 76%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MFAOAA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 135 136 129 136 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 136
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 136
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 1,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $1,038
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $159Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback