Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD V105 19 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	20% Poor	Memory 38.3 1-Core 17.5 2-Core 12.4 18% 22.7 Pts	4-Core 12.4 8-Core 13.8 2% 13.1 Pts	64-Core 12.1 1% 12.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 043D) 336MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.58 fps	MRender 0.71 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.91 0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 76 140 172 165 190 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.1% Below average	Read 156 Write 156 Mixed 164 SusWrite 141 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 14.5 49% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 48.9 DQ Write 41.6 DQ Mixed 44.9 34% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9DHTCN3B-HATP 1x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.5% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 0.6 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.5% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16