PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190613 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 08 '19 at 12:52 |
Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
78.6%
Very good
|
86% 155 Pts
|
84% 680 Pts
|
98% 1,455 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 970-$340
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.3%
Above average
|
53% 64.6 fps
|
52% 64.9 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 94 99 95 93 94 MB/s
|
75.8%
Very good
|
44% 204 MB/s
|
140% 52.4 MB/s
|
123% 173 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
65.7%
Good
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
40% 98.7 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $329Bench 87%, 432,810 samples | 7,176x |
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $526Bench 89%, 188,169 samples | 3,920x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $198Bench 84%, 703,010 samples | 2,913x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RX 5700-XTAMD $400Bench 107%, 302,536 samples | 3,057x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 403,865 samples | 3,043x |
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $770Bench 137%, 148,615 samples | 1,227x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $1,083 |