QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.1 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 11:35
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 22
1-Core 107
2-Core 185
53% 105 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 396
50% 380 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.4% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 50.8
46% 55.3 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 49.1
45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 57 62 68 79 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 203
Write 180
Mixed 198
SusWrite 67.1
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 14.1
48% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72.6
DQ Write 41.1
DQ Mixed 25
27% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 129GB
25GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 76 90 74 78 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 219
Write 197
Mixed 159
SusWrite 77.3
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 15.7
50% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 35
DQ Mixed 23.2
31% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 83%
Red Hat VirtIO 1.5TB
535GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 100 103 101 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 91.7
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 100
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x7GB
1 of 1 slots used
7GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 306
13% 306 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback