Asus P7P55 LX

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55 LX (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091110
Uptime	9.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '19 at 04:07
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 144 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 260 32% 246 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Lighting 82 Reflection 84.5 Parallax 82.2 67% 82.9 fps	MRender 79.9 Gravity 75.5 Splatting 65.9 60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 19GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 46 52 49 40 34 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.9% Average	Read 217 Write 91 Mixed 178 SusWrite 45.4 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 33.8 104% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 37.6 DQ Write 80.8 DQ Mixed 48.7 40% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 7GB free Firmware: CXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 43 43 42 42 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.8% Poor	Read 98.5 Write 114 Mixed 125 SusWrite 42.3 22% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 14.7 54% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 62.5 DQ Mixed 68.2 59% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 86%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 46GB free Firmware: X412 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 42 42 40 41 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.2% Average	Read 157 Write 145 Mixed 144 SusWrite 40.7 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 27.2 92% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 128 97% 130 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 36 36 35 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 114 Write 123 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 34.9 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 224GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 36 40 41 39 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 109 Write 104 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 39.3 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 84%
Patriot Memory 32GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 12GB free, PID 5400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 4.7 5.2 5.4 5.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	6.78% Terrible	Read 30 Write 16.3 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 5.3 17% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.78% Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 670GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 27 Write 21.8 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 21.2 31% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 13 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55 LX Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	120x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	85x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	25x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	11x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	167x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	147x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16