Asus 1011PX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus 1011PX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015PE
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 02:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Memory 42.8
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 13.5
17% 21.2 Pts
4-Core 23.7
8-Core 23.7
3% 23.7 Pts
64-Core 23.6
2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 102 99 97 85 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 126
Write 65.8
Mixed 118
SusWrite 97.8
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 13.6
47% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 17.8
14% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
7GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 16.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 17.7
26% 20 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
101% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback