Asus PRIME H270-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PRO  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 23:13
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700-$313
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.9% Good
1-Core 119
2-Core 221
81% 170 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 495
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 560
38% 560 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$98
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 106
Reflection 69
Parallax 105
28% 93.4 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 101
Splatting 77.5
28% 86.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$350
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 393
Write 441
Mixed 340
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 34.5
122% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 340
253% 336 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$100
742GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 137 144 145 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 97
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 140
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 83 85 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 95
Write 108
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 82.8
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 48
Write 128
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 83.9
65% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
204% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
4TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 83 84 82 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 160
Write 143
Mixed 118
SusWrite 84.4
165% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 97%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
2TB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 38.4
35% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
968GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 60 61 61 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 61.9
118% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSE.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSE.16FAR 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 19
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME H270-PRO Builds (Compare 1,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback