Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9730P RADEON R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 184 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 62 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 93.6 46% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 164 24% 175 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Acer(1025 1213) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	5.94% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 9.85 Parallax 11.8 6% 9.68 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 8.7 Splatting 7.35 6% 6.94 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.94% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 884GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU001J SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 19 84 97 92 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 138 Write 138 SusWrite 67.4 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.4 80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.5% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 40%, 4,052 samples	55x
A12-9730P RADEON R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 184 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	44x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	8x
Radeon 500AMDBench 13%, 1,010 samples	7x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	16x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	9x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	3x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	14x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	8x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 13,778 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16