Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 67%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 70.5
44% 64 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 197
20% 164 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4128
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 50.6
40% 53.1 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 57.5
44% 53.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 96 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 358
Write 221
Mixed 144
SusWrite 98.9
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 33.9
116% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 121
105% 161 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 126 126 125 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 126
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback