Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '19 at 16:54
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$76 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 53.2 1-Core 99 2-Core 143 56% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 168 19% 148 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 36FF) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 9.73 Reflection 9.04 12% 9.39 fps
Poor: 6% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB 3,562 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1107A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 45 127 66 61 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 434 Write 35.7 Mixed 112 SusWrite 94.8 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 5.9 60% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 97.7 DQ Mixed 9.5 33% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 93%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 25GB free Firmware: AM002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 99 102 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 84 Write 80.3 Mixed 26 SusWrite 101 53% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 120GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 111 110 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 110 72% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x8GB 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	414x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	238x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	283x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	218x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	193x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	81x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	57x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16