Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 11:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 97.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 537
61% 480 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8472) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 36
25% 31.8 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 32
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 151 142 164 169 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 179
Mixed 84
SusWrite 154
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 119%
SM-R140 4GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 3.8
Write 3.2
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 3.4
5% 3.47 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.6
191% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
SM-R140 4GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 3.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 3.4
5% 3.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.6
191% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,223
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback