Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 08:07
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 211
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 485
44% 369 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 11D1) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 15.9
10% 17.6 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 17.4
11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 335 344 345 334 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 452
Write 340
Mixed 292
SusWrite 336
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 26.7
102% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 140
117% 169 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 126%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
302GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 145
Write 143
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 110
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
241% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 7.5 6.6 6.7 6.1 6.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 13.3
Mixed 5
SusWrite 7.8
14% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.4
163% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback