Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '16 at 14:13
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 176 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 348 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.9% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 64 Parallax 56.8 49% 60.5 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 57.9 Splatting 51.4 48% 60 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10C 252 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 269 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 341 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 90 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327696 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 95 (F1) Unknown 100 100 847	90.9% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 459 Mixed 479 107% 479 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 14.1 105% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 62.9 109% 215 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 706GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 169 2466 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 472 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 263 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 330 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 466 (C2) HDA temperature 122 108 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	93% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 166 Mixed 155 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.37 133% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 109%
Intenso Ultra Line 128GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 78GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 189 Write 56.8 Mixed 59.1 104% 102 MB/s	4K Read 3.23 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.24 28% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 31%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB 6,219 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 6.52 Mixed 10.8 17% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.81 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.85 92% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB 6,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.5% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5305 G/C184 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x

SSD
PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10CSSDBench 68%, 252 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	6x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBMicronBench 62%, 35 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16