Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemToshiba Qosmio X75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48.7% Average
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 122
54% 107 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 77.4
26% 161 Pts
64-Core 361
24% 361 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 81.5
16% 62.3 fps
MRender 48.6
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 43.3
20% 54.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$107
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 274 346 214 174 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 448
Write 395
Mixed 366
SusWrite 242
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 40.2
128% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 246
190% 266 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
154GB free
Firmware: GH2OA900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 4.2 18 19 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 71%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
611GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 70
Write 61.3
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 102
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
158% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.6
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 15.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback