PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120821 |
Uptime | 20.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 07 '19 at 00:34 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 116 116 118 115 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
26GB free
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 243 276 278 277 275 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
53GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 18 18 18 18 MB/s
|
8.33%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 13x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 11x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 6x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |