Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A88-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime20.6 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 00:34
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 115
60% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 401
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 41.9
26% 34.1 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 32.5
30% 37 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 116 116 118 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 258
Write 120
Mixed 162
SusWrite 113
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 21.4
76% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 29
26% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 82%
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
26GB free
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 243 276 278 277 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 384
Write 333
Mixed 217
SusWrite 264
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 27.2
82% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 35.1
29% 40 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 104%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
53GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Read 25
Write 19
Mixed 21
SusWrite 16.5
27% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.3
94% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 37%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 21
Write 18.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 12.2
24% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 4.4
360% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback