Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 23:26
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-9900K-$490
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
1-Core 150
2-Core 302
106% 226 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,124
107% 861 Pts
64-Core 1,624
109% 1,624 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 440
Parallax 486
119% 459 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 466
Splatting 255
122% 320 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 121%
Great: 145%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$84
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 301 302 299 299 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 2,378
Write 1,447
Mixed 794
SusWrite 313
271% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 44.8
238% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 558
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 386
303% 424 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 204%
Great: 281%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
91GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 9,031
Write 6,161
Mixed 7,164
1,654% 7,452 MB/s
4K Read 789
4K Write 369
4K Mixed 457
1,976% 538 MB/s
DQ Read 1,835
DQ Write 1,358
DQ Mixed 1,396
1,098% 1,530 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 135%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$42
714GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 175 175 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 160
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 171
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$44
585GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 163 160 163 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 148
Mixed 31
SusWrite 162
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 106%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
25GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 15 20 19 21 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Read 10
Write 5.3
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 16.6
14% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 49.9
80% 49.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 10,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,645
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $631SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback