Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 22:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 740
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.7
39% 49 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 43.2
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 133%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 30.3
10% 22.7 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 30.9
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV76D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 295 295 289 283 280 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1014
Write 306
Mixed 331
SusWrite 290
106% 485 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 40
195% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 412
366% 570 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 145%
Great: 147%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 202 203 201 197 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 151
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 200
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback