Hp-pavilion FL437AA-ABF a6641af

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion FL437AA-ABF a6641af  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 84.5
43% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 170
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 165
11% 165 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 9.28
7% 8.66 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 7.22
6% 8.58 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 94 74 92 94 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 98
Write 98.2
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 85.7
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback