Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270I GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170105
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '19 at 19:00
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 91.8 2-Core 188 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 400 51% 386 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Lighting 43 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 36.8 35% 36.6 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 35 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 299 303 303 303 307 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 307 Mixed 292 SusWrite 302 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 36.2 134% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 228 199% 297 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 139GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 1091 1026 1039 1080 1042 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2,327 Write 2,238 Mixed 1,396 SusWrite 1,125 396% 1,771 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 79.4 259% 89.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,203 DQ Write 1013 DQ Mixed 1,168 859% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 372%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 15GB free Firmware: 04.05G11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 76 97 102 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 99 Write 96.5 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 87.3 66% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 26.8 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 30.3 SC Mixed 22.2 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 107%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
1TB SSD 1TBLexarBench 184%, 3,679 samples	51x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	48x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	38x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	55x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	45x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $726

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16