Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 642
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 69.3
61% 72.1 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 70.3
56% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 287 290 290 286 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 2,123
Write 1451
Mixed 969
SusWrite 312
268% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 58.6
195% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 1106
DQ Mixed 872
695% 961 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 209%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
740GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 124 138 125 128 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 141
Mixed 108
SusWrite 129
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback