Asus M80CJ-O

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus M80CJ-O (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M80CJ-O
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '19 at 17:15
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 191 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 390 52% 387 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 873B) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.5% Average	Lighting 52.5 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 57.4 43% 58.6 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 63.4 Splatting 66.7 54% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U512G1002 512GB 4,967 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4131002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 162 76 92 38 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 440 Write 219 Mixed 185 SusWrite 104 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 21.4 88% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 133 142% 238 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 376GB free Firmware: AX0R5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 82 82 84 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 89.3 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 83.2 55% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 1x16GB 593 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M80CJ-O Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus M80CJ-O

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	81x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	81x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	19x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	10x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	8x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	44x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	10x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GBG.SKILLBench 42%, 1,345 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16