Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 109% UFO	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '19 at 16:58
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 97.1 1-Core 159 2-Core 318 104% 191 Pts	4-Core 635 8-Core 1251 112% 943 Pts	64-Core 1,755 109% 1,755 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 73.2 Reflection 74.1 Parallax 93.1 60% 80.1 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 74.2 Splatting 58.7 55% 68.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2316 807 814 814 816 814 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	330% Outstanding	Read 2,680 Write 2467 Mixed 1,875 SusWrite 1,063 452% 2,021 MB/s	4K Read 71.3 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 96.1 318% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 1,447 DQ Write 1,212 DQ Mixed 1,304 984% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 330% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 16GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 505 Write 492 Mixed 415 105% 471 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 65.1 227% 82.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 357 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 754GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1558 1489 1535 1567 1565 1566 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 1,441 Write 1,568 Mixed 1093 SusWrite 1,547 319% 1,412 MB/s	4K Read 62 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 79.6 277% 98.4 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 907 DQ Mixed 272 345% 604 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 255%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 216GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 67 70 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 79.5 Write 44.8 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 69 46% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 62%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 109 Write 47.2 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 110 59% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB 1,959 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 32.6 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 49 SC Mixed 34.1 101% 35.5 GB/s	Latency 49.9 80% 49.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,864x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,609x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	556x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,303x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	650x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	640x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	857x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	566x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,321

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16