Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 35.9 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 97.1 33% 59.6 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 192 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.78 2% 2.14 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB 3,328 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: T876201 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 347 Write 327 Mixed 320 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 26.2 77% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 80.7 108% 198 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT53B256M32D1NP-062AIT:C 4x1GB 428 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 9.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	16x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	4x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	12x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	5x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	4x

RAM
K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GBSamsungBench 19%, 1,067 samples	8x
MT53B256M32D1NP-062AIT:C 4x1GBMicronBench 20%, 428 samples	7x
MT53B256M32D1NP-062AIT:C 2x1GBMicronBench 14%, 127 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16