Gigabyte GA-VM900M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte GA-VM900M
MotherboardGigabyte GA-VM900M  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 13:00
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium E5500
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
25.3% Poor
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 101
36% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 101
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 102
7% 102 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SV2011H 20GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RL100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 19 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 23.2
Write 18.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 19
14% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 18%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$20
236GB free
Firmware: GS001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 82.7
Write 83.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 82.2
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-VM900M Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-VM900M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $134
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback