Samsung R520/R522/R620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung R520/R522/R620  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R520/R522/R620
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 10:58
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 87%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4200-$99
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 54.8
1-Core 16.9
2-Core 27
25% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 33.8
4% 32.9 Pts
64-Core 42.9
3% 42.9 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300
Sanyo(144D C050) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.06
1% 1.49 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT63L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 102 123 117 132 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 209
Write 128
Mixed 130
SusWrite 113
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 11.1
39% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 52.8
46% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung HM320JI 320GB
185GB free
Firmware: 2SS00_01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 46 48 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 49.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 46.3
33% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 36%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
1TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 15.3
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 16.8
23% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R520/R522/R620 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R520/R522/R620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $99
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback