Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 275E4E/275E5E (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP275E4V-X01ID
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130805
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '19 at 07:37
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-2000 APU (2012 M.Za) 927 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 40.3 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 37.7 22% 32.8 Pts	4-Core 40.1 8-Core 38.5 5% 39.3 Pts	64-Core 38.5 2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340 3,203 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C680) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1 1% 0.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-120 120GB 1,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 128 57 44 33 35 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 343 Write 258 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 84.9 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 8 27% 8.3 MB/s	DQ Read 75 DQ Write 35.8 DQ Mixed 1.5 15% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 164GB free Firmware: AX002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 99 100 97 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 88.6 Mixed 32 SusWrite 96.3 55% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 275E4E/275E5E Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

CPU
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	25x
E2-2000 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 27%, 927 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	25x
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples	14x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
KP330 120GBKingbankBench 63%, 173 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	4x
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16