| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
| Memory | 26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20151119 |
| Uptime | 8.6 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 06 '19 at 06:56 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | SVN-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
66.1%
Good
|
63% 106 Pts
|
41% 309 Pts
|
19% 313 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.16
|
22.2%
Poor
|
20% 28.9 fps
|
26% 31.9 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
83.3%
Excellent
|
92% 32.2 GB/s
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
48% 82.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,960 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z440 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,239x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,036x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 860x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 739x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 376x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |