PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3048h |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 9.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151019 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 06 '19 at 04:52 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | MAR-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
|
3.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 16 28 47 31 25 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
2GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 21 33 44 18 2.9 MB/s
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
14.1%
Very poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 97x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 81x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 205x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 36x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 27x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 12x |
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples | 6x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |