Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150422
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '19 at 04:17
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51 10,924 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 35.8 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 88.4 32% 55.8 Pts	4-Core 91 8-Core 81.7 12% 86.3 Pts	64-Core 91.1 6% 91.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 5214) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 0.56 2% 1.62 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 1.87 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB 4,336 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.K SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 27 69 123 127 237 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 244 Write 10.8 Mixed 149 SusWrite 103 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 5.2 56% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 61.5 DQ Mixed 18.6 20% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 83%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 132GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 179 95 91 94 96 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 160 Write 158 Mixed 158 SusWrite 132 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 15.8 60% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 37.2 30% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 3,795 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2H Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	13x
A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples	11x
A6-6400K APUAMD $81Bench 40%, 13,306 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	13x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 4,872 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 689 samples	4x
M378B5673FH0- 2x2GBSamsungBench 32%, 54 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16