Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3710 12,685 User benchmarks, average bench 25% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 39.4 1-Core 25.6 2-Core 51.2 25% 38.7 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 102 14% 102 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1D5D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 3.72 2% 2.56 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 2.57 2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 303 307 307 308 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 400 Write 362 Mixed 278 SusWrite 306 76% 337 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 30.4 80% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 206 154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF1G64HDZ-1G6A1 1x8GB 446 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	22x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	19x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	13x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	70x

SSD
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 20%, 5,898 samples	22x
8KTF51264HDZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 24%, 1,041 samples	13x
8KTF51264HDZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 16%, 114 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16