Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 21:52
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 273
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 844
86% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 40
Reflection 32
Parallax 37.9
33% 36.6 fps
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 37.3
34% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 403 398 400 419 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 464
Mixed 444
SusWrite 418
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 59.2
197% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 294
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38
366GB free
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 937 932 931 933 937 735 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 947
Mixed 907
SusWrite 901
236% 1,055 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 81.8
300% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 222
286% 494 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 234%
Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
653GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 203 194 193 191 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 150
Mixed 68
SusWrite 197
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
628GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 99 96 99 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 121
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 103
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 166 164 164 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 94
Write 128
Mixed 68
SusWrite 163
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 174 176 170 170 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,246
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback