Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 19:47
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 905
91% 737 Pts
64-Core 1374
85% 1374 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8671) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 111
Parallax 137
104% 125 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 117
Splatting 84.5
97% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1318 977 1007 987 986 987 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 2,251
Mixed 1,764
SusWrite 1,044
397% 1,765 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 75.6
270% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,278
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 1,190
896% 1,199 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 281%
Great: 297%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
56GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 59 60 52 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 391
Write 64.5
Mixed 102
SusWrite 55
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4.4
55% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
77GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 108
Write 97.7
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 101
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
121GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 94 93 94 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 162
Write 146
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 92.5
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
135GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 64 69 63 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 52.7
Write 55
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 66.7
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,456
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback