Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190730
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 17:33
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 210 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 592 59% 479 Pts	64-Core 601 37% 601 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 59.8 Parallax 81 54% 68.9 fps	MRender 60.6 Gravity 57.9 Splatting 76.2 54% 64.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 361 343 371 372 343 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 474 Write 382 Mixed 285 SusWrite 357 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 28.1 108% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 152 124% 183 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 85%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 85GB free Firmware: 00.0NA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 66 67 66 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 102 Write 99.5 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 66.3 61% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 62%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 266GB free Firmware: 00.0NA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 107 108 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 107 71% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 62%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 664GB free Firmware: 00.0NA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 109 108 109 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 108 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 62%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 639GB free Firmware: 00.0NA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 73 72 72 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 97 Write 95.2 Mixed 63 SusWrite 72.5 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 62%
WDC WD25 00JD-55HBC0 250GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 181GB free, PID ce23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 37 Write 38.7 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 39.7 49% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB 11,950 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 33.5 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 28.4 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)