| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170418 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '19 at 17:04 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.6%
Very good
|
77% 137 Pts
|
56% 418 Pts
|
26% 414 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85E0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.3%
Very poor
|
0% 20.6 fps
|
54% 65.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 75 57 71 56 48 MB/s
|
72%
Very good
|
49% 225 MB/s
|
110% 37.3 MB/s
|
201% 297 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
225GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 129 142 146 145 160 MB/s
|
80.4%
Excellent
|
83% 114 MB/s
|
132% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
28GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 24 13 14 MB/s
|
21.7%
Poor
|
38% 28.7 MB/s
|
270% 4.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.9%
Average
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
51% 78.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,113 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 392x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 381x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 352x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 399x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 346x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 217x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $234 |