Lenovo 20F10032PG

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo 20F10032PG (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20F10032PG
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	89%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6600U 31,982 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 168 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 262 35% 261 Pts	64-Core 251 16% 251 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 222C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6913 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 9 Parallax 6.22 5% 7.04 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 0.07 Splatting 11.6 6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT04L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 54 56 61 55 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 364 Write 326 Mixed 264 SusWrite 78.9 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 30 107% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 331 254% 347 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 112%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 309GB free Firmware: AV0A2E SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 94 93 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 98.5 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 93.7 63% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 18.5 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 20F10032PG

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)