MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star PE62 7RE
Motherboard	MSI MS-16J9 (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171024
Uptime	12.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 12:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 82.9 42% 65 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 222 23% 185 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.81% Terrible	Lighting 7.67 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 7.28 6% 8.82 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 15 8% 8.86 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.81% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 149 147 148 148 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 870 Write 748 Mixed 546 SusWrite 147 129% 578 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 35.3 124% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 200 170% 254 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 234%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 250GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 105 106 104 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	56% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 86.5 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 105 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 150% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 10.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.7 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,444x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,291x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,228x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,008x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	498x

SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	207x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	126x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	110x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	758x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	304x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	212x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16