HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1631
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161027
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 12:53
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 92 2-Core 158 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 224 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1631) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 314.7 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.3 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.53 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128 128GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 129 132 133 134 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 452 Write 138 Mixed 158 SusWrite 133 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 19.6 85% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 63.5 95% 186 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 76%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 20GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 12 12 11 9.9 7.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 8.2 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 10.1 22% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 84% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 58%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 25GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 42 43 43 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 97.9 Write 28.7 Mixed 50 SusWrite 42.5 65% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 80% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

CPU
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	91x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	77x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	64x

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	287x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	126x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	189x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	63x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16