Asus P6T

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 12:12
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 940-$79 2,107 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 135 60% 96.4 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 389 37% 305 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30% Below average	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 35.5 30% 33.2 fps	MRender 42.8 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 35.4 31% 38 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9090 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 98 100 99 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 75 Write 116 Mixed 102 SusWrite 96.1 22% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 9.7 55% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 21.6 18% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 169GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 66 63 65 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 77 Write 76.5 Mixed 53 SusWrite 64.5 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 57%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 69GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 66 63 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 62.8 Write 65.8 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 64.5 45% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 38% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 16.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.5 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	566x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	144x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	50x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	124x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16