Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 12:05
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 145 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 390 42% 333 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% EVGA(3842 2751) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 15 Parallax 15.8 15% 16.3 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 15.3 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 285 286 283 280 284 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Seri 250GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 39GB free Firmware: DXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 42 41 38 40 40 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 183 Write 42.8 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 41.1 19% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 15 50% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 94.4 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 41.6 40% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 393GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 87 87 87 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 83 Write 79 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 87.4 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 75%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 222GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 63 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 64.5 Write 62.7 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 63.4 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 104GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 71 69 66 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 79 Write 88 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 68.5 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 51%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 126 124 123 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 84 Write 99.8 Mixed 71 SusWrite 125 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 164% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 4x8GB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.9% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	88x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	75x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x

RAM
DDR3 1600G 2x4GBUnknownBench 51%, 1,144 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16