Asus P7H55-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M LX  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 07:23
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3 540-$62
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
37.4% Below average
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 117
46% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 170
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 182
12% 182 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 361.43
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.32% Terrible
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 37.1
8% 30.4 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 30.2
8% 29.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.32%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$22
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 33 54 51 46 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 18
Write 60.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 49.9
27% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 55%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 11.8
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 11.7
18% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
67% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 16%
ASolid 4GB
0GB free, PID 1302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.9 6 6.3 6 6.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 5.9
11% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 37%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P7H55-M LX Builds (Compare 1,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $137
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback