Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory75 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111219
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 06:57
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5677
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.2% Good
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 178
63% 134 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 511
55% 427 Pts
64-Core 883
59% 883 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
EVGA(3842 5180) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 374
Reflection 338
Parallax 332
98% 348 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 370
Splatting 237
99% 280 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 219 217 209 206 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 249
Write 239
Mixed 225
SusWrite 212
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 30.4
100% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 196 194 195 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 135
Write 90.5
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 195
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 115%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
215GB free
Firmware: 5G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 120
Write 113
Mixed 76
SusWrite 118
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 79%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
125GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 21.7
Write 26
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 25.4
33% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.4
145% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 19.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $385
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback