Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 36.2 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 65.3 30% 48.7 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 134 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.59 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 512G 512GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 450GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1204B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 340 287 301 343 355 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 424 Write 340 Mixed 343 SusWrite 326 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 17 73% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 27.6 53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 220%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	10x
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	7x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	6x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	9x
123456789012345678 2x3GBABCDBench 22%, 487 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16