Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 23:43
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 498
66% 495 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 74.9
46% 64.8 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 56.8
Splatting 53.5
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HS-SSD-E100N 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 431 434 442 425 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 448
Mixed 420
SusWrite 430
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 29.2
142% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 44
95% 190 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 101%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 66 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 7.8
Write 49.3
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 62.8
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 61%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
57GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 12.6
Mixed 11.1
SusWrite 13.1
17% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 25.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $528
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback