Asus M3A-H/HDMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M3A-H/HDMI  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110124
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 99.9
49% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 21.6
18% 20 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 60 40 46 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35% Below average
Read 247
Write 211
Mixed 198
SusWrite 52.2
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 15.7
65% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 87.1
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 24
24% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
217GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 60 40 46 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49% Average
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 52.2
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
147GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 60 40 46 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 60
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 52.4
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
WD WD800JB-00JJC0 80GB
55GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 55.2
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 39.1
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 31%
Maxtor 6E040L0 41GB-$27
35GB free
Firmware: NAR61590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 56.9
Write 56.4
Mixed 38
SusWrite 39.2
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A-H/HDMI Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3A-H/HDMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $84
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback